The Offices imposed fine exceeding CZK 10 million on the collective rights management organisation OSA for abuse of dominant position
The collective rights management organisation violated both the Czech Competition Act and the EU competition rules by imposing inadequate conditions on accommodation facilities for acquiring licenses for usage of copyright by means of audio or audio-visual devices in rooms of accommodation facilities between 2008 and 2014.
The abuse consisted in the fact that within the abovementioned period, the party to the proceedings did not take into account the occupancy of rooms in accommodation facilities. On that basis, the operators of accommodation facilities paid for licences even when the room was not occupied at all. It is worth mentioning that the party had took the occupancy of rooms into account until 18/5/2008 as a relevant criteria for calculation of royalties, but it seized from this practice in connection to the introduction of statutory regulation of the maximum level of royalties. Therefore, it is obvious that the only reason for seizing from the taking the room occupancy into account was an effort to maximize the amount of the royalties collected from the accommodation facilities.
The Office has found that the requirement of royalty payment even in cases when it can be proved that the copyright work could not been used by the acquirer of the license, i. e. when the room was not occupied and therefore no consideration was provided, can’t be seen as an adequate condition and it thereby does not fulfil the requirement of proportionality of mutual performance and consideration of the contract.
Given the fact that the OSA represents foreign authors as well, the Office considers that the trade between member states has been affected.
2024-06-19 / Office for the Protection of Competition Cooperates with European Public Prosecutor's Office Today in Luxembourg, Mr Petr Mlsna, the Chairman of the Office for the Protection of Competition, signed an agreement with the European chief prosecutor, Ms Laura Codruţa Kövesi, on cooperation between...
2024-05-09 / The Office Revealed and Punished Another Cartel Agreement between Construction Companies The Office for the Protection of Competition imposed fines totalling CZK 7,442,000 on the construction companies B.H.S. BOHEMIA, a.s., SEŽEV facility s.r.o., COMMODUM, spol. s r.o. and Hroší stavby...
2024-04-23 / EP ENERGY TRADING Infringed Competition Act by Early Implementation of Merger With Gazela Energy The Office for the Protection of Competition (the Office) imposed a fine of CZK 18,840,000 on the undertaking EP ENERGY TRADING. for concluding a concentration between undertakings prior to the notification...
2024-04-18 / Sector Inquiry on Waste Management The Office for the Protection of Competition (the Office) has initiated a large-scale sector inquiry focused on waste management. Over the next two years, the Office shall obtain information from all...
2024-04-09 / Zásilkovna will share pick-up points thanks to the intervention of the Office, more options for consumers The Office for the Protection of Competition (“the Office”) accepted commitments from an undertaking Zásilkovna s.r.o. consisting of an amendment to the contractual terms and conditions concluded...
2024-04-05 / Fine of CZK 8 million for Another Pet Food Distributor Forbiding Lower Prices By the first-instance decision, the Office for the Protection of Competition (“the Office”) imposed a fine of CZK 8,656,000 on the undertaking Dibaq a.s. for entering into prohibited agreements on...
2024-04-03 / The Office Imposed a Fine of CZK 72 million on Distributor of Moulinex, Rowenta, Krups and Tefal Products The Office for the Protection of Competition (hereinafter referred to as “the Office”) imposed a fine of CZK 72 333 000 on the undertaking Groupe SEB ČR s.r.o. for prohibited agreements on resale...
2024-02-13 / The Office Imposed a Record Fine of CZK 125 million on ELECTROLUX for Anticompetitive Conduct The Office for the Protection of Competition (hereinafter referred to as “the Office”) punished the undertaking ELECTROLUX, by imposing a fine of CZK 125 404 000 for long-term anticompetitive conduct...
