Manager of EGEM Did Not Fulfil the Obligation to Cooperate during the Dawn Raid, the Office Imposed a Fine Amounting to CZK 2,362,000
Petr Mlsna commented the case as follows. “Cooperation of the undertaking during the dawn raid is absolutely necessary; what is more, the undertaking is legally obliged to do so.”
The undertaking did not fulfil the legal obligation to fully cooperate during the inspection carried out by the Office on 4 September 2019. Firstly, the undertaking promised that its manager would make his working electronic devices available to the Office’s investigation. However, the manager did not fulfil this promise influencing the course and the aim of the inspection.
The undertaking raised several objections within the appeal. According to the undertaking, the Office tried to restrict personal liberty of the manager when asking him to take part in the dawn raid. In addition, the undertaking denied its own promise to ensure the manager´s presence at its commercial premises during the dawn raid. Last but not least, the undertaking did not agree with the level of the imposed fine as well.
The Chairman of the Office rejected all the objections. The undertaking is not allowed to avoid examination of its electronic devices and communication channels due to absence of the manager at its commercial premises during the dawn raid. The level of the fine is considered as adequate by the Chairman of the Office. It is possible to impose a fine of up to CZK 300,000 or up to 1% of the undertaking’s turnover for such infringement of the Competition act. The imposed fine reaches the amount of 0.1% of the turnover and it is fully in accordance with the amount of fines imposed in similar cases.
The legality of the inspection carried out by the Office was upheld by the Regional Court in Brno, which rejected the administrative action of EGEM against an illegal intervention.
Press Unit of the Office
21/006 – R0228/2019
2025-01-08 / Google Made Changes to one of its Services in Reaction to the Investigation of the Office Last year, the Office for the Protection of Competition investigated possible abuse of a dominant position by Google Czech Republic, s.r.o, its parent company Google International LLC and Google Ireland...
2024-11-19 / Pet Food Supplier VAFO Has to Pay CZK 120 million for Prohibited Resale Price Fixing The Office for the Protection of Competition (hereinafter referred to as “the Office”) imposed a fine of CZK 120,121,000 on the undertaking VAFO PRAHA (hereinafter referred to as "VAFO") for the...
2024-10-16 / The Office is Conducting a Dawn Raid at the Premises of the Undertaking Seznam.cz Following numerous media inquiries, we confirm that the Office for the Protection of Competition (hereinafter referred to as “the Office“) is conducting an unannounced inspection of Seznam.cz
2024-10-01 / Merger of PPF Group and Nordic Telecom May Take Place Subject to Commitments The Office for the Protection of Competition has cleared the merger by its final decision, as a result of which PPF TMT Holdco 2 B.V. may acquire, through O2 Czech Republic a.s., sole control over Nordic...
2024-09-16 / The 2024 St. Martin's Conference Program Will Offer a new Competition Tool and Private Enforcement The Office for the Protection of Competition (hereinafter referred to as "the Office") is preparing the 17th annual St. Martin Conference on trends, news and hot topics in the field of competition. The...
2024-07-11 / English Version of Annual Report 2023 published The Office for the Protection of Competition presents the English version of its annual report for the year 2023, summarising the results of its activities in all areas of its competence, i.e., in the...
2024-06-19 / Office for the Protection of Competition Cooperates with European Public Prosecutor's Office Today in Luxembourg, Mr Petr Mlsna, the Chairman of the Office for the Protection of Competition, signed an agreement with the European chief prosecutor, Ms Laura Codruţa Kövesi, on cooperation between...
2024-05-09 / The Office Revealed and Punished Another Cartel Agreement between Construction Companies The Office for the Protection of Competition imposed fines totalling CZK 7,442,000 on the construction companies B.H.S. BOHEMIA, a.s., SEŽEV facility s.r.o., COMMODUM, spol. s r.o. and Hroší stavby...
