SPIE Elektrovod and ASE Were Fined Almost CZK 34 Million for Public Procurement Cartel
The decision has not been appealed and is therefore final. The parties to the proceedings benefited from the leniency programme and the settlement procedure, for which their fines were reduced.
According to the findings of the Office, the competitors coordinated their participation and bids for three public contracts of the contracting authority ČEPS, a.s., which namely involved the award procedures "MIL – Repair of Switches by Replacement in the AD 03, 06 and 09 Field - Implementation"; "DAS - Replacement of DG (P.0473)" and "NOS - Replacement of Switch in the T402 Tertiary (G.0127)". The value of these contracts exceeded CZK 18 million.
The Office proved the anticompetitive conduct of both undertakings on the basis of the evidence of their phone, instant messaging and in-person communications. The undertakings coordinated their activities in tenders (bid rigging) and thus concluded a market division agreement and a price fixing agreement. These practices fall into the category of so-called hard-core cartels and constitute the most serious infringements of the Act on the Protection of Competition.
Both companies applied for the leniency and for the settlement procedure, for which their fines were significantly reduced to a total of CZK 32,498,000 for SPIE Elektrovod and CZK 1,419,000 for ASE. Thanks to the leniency and settlement applications, the undertakings also avoided the ban on the performance of public contracts, which may also be imposed by the Office for bid rigging cartels.
Press Unit of the Office
21/071 – S0377/2019
2025-11-20 / Office for the Protection of Competition has agreed on commitments with Alma Career, job portal system will be more accessible to competitors The Office for the Protection of Competition has closed administrative proceedings concerning the possible abuse of a dominant position by the Alma Career Group in the field of advertising on job portals...
2025-11-20 / Office for the Protection of Competition imposed fine of CZK 9.9 million on K + B Progres for fixing prices for retailers The Office for the Protection of Competition issued a decision to impose a fine of CZK 9,904,000 on K + B Progres, a.s., for infringement of national and EU competition rules. The company was found guilty...
2025-11-13 / Save the Date: ICN Unilateral Conduct Workshop to be held in Prague in April 2026 The Office for the Protection of Competition of the Czech Republic will host next year’s workshop of the International Competition Network (ICN) focusing on unilateral conduct
2025-11-07 / The 2025 St. Martin's Conference Addressed EU-wide Issues and Czech Competition Policy Tools On 5 and 6 November 2025, the 18th annual St. Martin's Conference on news and current trends in the protection of competition and significant market power was held at the premises of the Office for the...
2025-11-07 / AWARDS FOR CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE PROTECTION OF COMPETITION AND FOR THE BEST STUDENT THESIS WERE PRESENTED AT THE ST. MARTIN'S CONFERENCE. During the St. Martin's Conference, Mr. Petr Mlsna, Chairman of the Office for the Protection of Competition, presented Mr. Bogdan Chiritoiu, Chairman of the Romanian Competition Authority, with an award...
2025-10-13 / Merger of Car Dealers in České Budějovice Approved Subject to Conditions Consisting of KIA Car Service Centre Divesture The Office for the Protection of Competition has conditionally cleared the concentration between undertakings CB Auto a.s. and AUTO FUTURE, s.r.o., in the market of the retail sale and servicing of passenger...
2025-09-08 / St. Martin's Conference 2025: introducing topics and opening registration The Office for the Protection of Competition (hereinafter referred to as "the Office") invites experts and others interested in competition law to the 18th annual St. Martin's Conference, which will...
2025-08-05 / The Office Has Again Imposed Fines on Three Meal Voucher Issuers Totalling over CZK 279 million The Office for the Protection of Competition (hereinafter referred to as “the Office”) issued a first-instance decision to reimpose fines on meal voucher issuers, further specifying the exact reasons...