Merger of ČEZ and regional distribution companies
The Chairman of the Office Josef Bednář in fact confirmed in the main points of the verdict the first-instance decision of the antimonopoly office of 10 December 2002. The party to the proceeding is obliged to divest its shares representing 34% of the basic assets of the company ČEPS. Furthermore, the company ČEZ is obliged to divest all its shares in the companies Pražská energetika, Jihočeská energetika and Jihomoravská energetika, which it is to acquire through this concentration. The third condition sets obligation to divest shares in one of the regional electricity distribution companies to be acquired by the company ČEZ on the basis of this concentration.
The Chairman of the Office in the appellate proceeding satisfied some of the objections raised by the company ČEZ. The deadlines for fulfilling the individual conditions set by the decision have been prolonged. The divestiture of shares to be made by ČEZ will not be subject to previous approval by the antimonopoly office. The second-instance decision, furthermore, does not set to whom the share in the basic assets of the company ČEPS is to be sold. The Chairman Bednář thus partially satisfied the objections raised by the company ČEZ. Nevertheless, the factual substance of the first-instance decision of the Office was not changed. The proceeding was demanding, the Office paid from the very beginning a great attention in particular to impacts on the final consumer and also to the impact on businesses and at the same time looked for a solution enabling creation of a strong entity able to compete also in the European market.
Press and Information Department
2025-11-20 / Office for the Protection of Competition has agreed on commitments with Alma Career, job portal system will be more accessible to competitors The Office for the Protection of Competition has closed administrative proceedings concerning the possible abuse of a dominant position by the Alma Career Group in the field of advertising on job portals...
2025-11-20 / Office for the Protection of Competition imposed fine of CZK 9.9 million on K + B Progres for fixing prices for retailers The Office for the Protection of Competition issued a decision to impose a fine of CZK 9,904,000 on K + B Progres, a.s., for infringement of national and EU competition rules. The company was found guilty...
2025-11-13 / Save the Date: ICN Unilateral Conduct Workshop to be held in Prague in April 2026 The Office for the Protection of Competition of the Czech Republic will host next year’s workshop of the International Competition Network (ICN) focusing on unilateral conduct
2025-11-07 / The 2025 St. Martin's Conference Addressed EU-wide Issues and Czech Competition Policy Tools On 5 and 6 November 2025, the 18th annual St. Martin's Conference on news and current trends in the protection of competition and significant market power was held at the premises of the Office for the...
2025-11-07 / AWARDS FOR CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE PROTECTION OF COMPETITION AND FOR THE BEST STUDENT THESIS WERE PRESENTED AT THE ST. MARTIN'S CONFERENCE. During the St. Martin's Conference, Mr. Petr Mlsna, Chairman of the Office for the Protection of Competition, presented Mr. Bogdan Chiritoiu, Chairman of the Romanian Competition Authority, with an award...
2025-10-13 / Merger of Car Dealers in České Budějovice Approved Subject to Conditions Consisting of KIA Car Service Centre Divesture The Office for the Protection of Competition has conditionally cleared the concentration between undertakings CB Auto a.s. and AUTO FUTURE, s.r.o., in the market of the retail sale and servicing of passenger...
2025-09-08 / St. Martin's Conference 2025: introducing topics and opening registration The Office for the Protection of Competition (hereinafter referred to as "the Office") invites experts and others interested in competition law to the 18th annual St. Martin's Conference, which will...
2025-08-05 / The Office Has Again Imposed Fines on Three Meal Voucher Issuers Totalling over CZK 279 million The Office for the Protection of Competition (hereinafter referred to as “the Office”) issued a first-instance decision to reimpose fines on meal voucher issuers, further specifying the exact reasons...