Merger RWE/Transgas authorised
“The Office in the three-months administrative proceeding assessed especially the impacts of the concentration on competition and final consumers”, commented the Chairman of the Office for the Protection of Competition, Josef Bednář.
“On the basis of individual analyses we have reached the conclusion, that it is necessary to determine conditions on the grounds of which the concentration will be approved,” commented Bednář. Two of the three conditions relate to business activities of Moravské naftové doly. “Company RWE must not acquire control over this company and block its decisions on the intentions, which are of evident competitive character against company RWE”, commented Bednář.
The third condition relates to the assessment of interchangeability of individual media especially on regional markets. “Company RWE must not acquire control shares in distribution companies in the area of electric power and heat until the privatisation is over”, commented Bednář.
During the assessment of the case the Office examined the positions of the third parties on the concentration, i.e. comments of the competing companies. The Office received overall 9 serious objections against the concentration (+ one natural person). The Office also regarded the position of the Energy regulation office and the National property fund. The Office also considered the decision making practice of the European Court of Justice and the European Commission and in this context it used 83 decisions issued by these authorities and competition offices of the EU member states. It was for example the concentration of the year 2000 VEBY/VIAG assessed by the European Commission and also the decision of the Spanish competition tribunal in case of non-approval of the concentration of companies Endesa and Gas Natural.
“The Competition Office by determination of the conditions established grounds for effective competition especially pro futuro in relation to expected liberalisation of the market. The Office was naturally concerned with not exposing consumers to the pressure of monopoly prices, and setting the prices for gas on the basis of competition”, commented Bednář.
The case of concentration of RWE and Transgas was from the view of the extent of the transaction the biggest that the Office has so far dealt with in its ten years history.
Conditions for preservation of effective competition
<dir> <dir> </dir></dir>- Company RWE Gas AG, must not directly or indirectly raise the actual joint per cent share of the company Jihomoravská plynárenksa, a.s. in the basic capital of the company Moravské naftové doly, a.s., without approval of the Office for the Protection of Competition, and it must not, in case of preserving the current joint per cent share of companies Jihomoravská plynárenská, a.s. and Transgas, a.s. in the basic capital, acquire in any way direct or indirect control over the company Moravské naftové doly, a.s.
- Company RWE Gas AG, must not block the decisions of company Moravské naftové doly, a.s. concerning the intentions, which shall have evident competition character against the company RWE Gas AG, with the exemption of the cases, which would under objective assessment lead to prejudice of company Moravské naftové doly, a.s. or its shareholders.
- Company RWE Gas AG, must not, without approval of the Office for the Protection of Competition, directly or through its subsidiaries on any level acquire shares in the electric power distribution and heat distribution companies or build new electric power distribution and heat distribution companies in the Czech Republic until the privatisation is over, however during five years at most.
During the administrative proceeding the Office received
comments from following companies:
- Metalimex
- Západoč- eská energetika
- Pražská plynárenská
- IFNE
- ESPO Týniště nad Orlicí
- Moravské naftové doly
- SPP Bohemia
- Jihočeská plynárenská
- Free Trade Energy Agency
- <dir> <dir> </dir></dir>+ one natural person
Press Department of the Office
2024-11-19 / Pet Food Supplier VAFO Has to Pay CZK 120 million for Prohibited Resale Price Fixing The Office for the Protection of Competition (hereinafter referred to as “the Office”) imposed a fine of CZK 120,121,000 on the undertaking VAFO PRAHA (hereinafter referred to as "VAFO") for the...
2024-10-16 / The Office is Conducting a Dawn Raid at the Premises of the Undertaking Seznam.cz Following numerous media inquiries, we confirm that the Office for the Protection of Competition (hereinafter referred to as “the Office“) is conducting an unannounced inspection of Seznam.cz
2024-10-01 / Merger of PPF Group and Nordic Telecom May Take Place Subject to Commitments The Office for the Protection of Competition has cleared the merger by its final decision, as a result of which PPF TMT Holdco 2 B.V. may acquire, through O2 Czech Republic a.s., sole control over Nordic...
2024-09-16 / The 2024 St. Martin's Conference Program Will Offer a new Competition Tool and Private Enforcement The Office for the Protection of Competition (hereinafter referred to as "the Office") is preparing the 17th annual St. Martin Conference on trends, news and hot topics in the field of competition. The...
2024-07-11 / English Version of Annual Report 2023 published The Office for the Protection of Competition presents the English version of its annual report for the year 2023, summarising the results of its activities in all areas of its competence, i.e., in the...
2024-06-19 / Office for the Protection of Competition Cooperates with European Public Prosecutor's Office Today in Luxembourg, Mr Petr Mlsna, the Chairman of the Office for the Protection of Competition, signed an agreement with the European chief prosecutor, Ms Laura Codruţa Kövesi, on cooperation between...
2024-05-09 / The Office Revealed and Punished Another Cartel Agreement between Construction Companies The Office for the Protection of Competition imposed fines totalling CZK 7,442,000 on the construction companies B.H.S. BOHEMIA, a.s., SEŽEV facility s.r.o., COMMODUM, spol. s r.o. and Hroší stavby...
2024-04-23 / EP ENERGY TRADING Infringed Competition Act by Early Implementation of Merger With Gazela Energy The Office for the Protection of Competition (the Office) imposed a fine of CZK 18,840,000 on the undertaking EP ENERGY TRADING. for concluding a concentration between undertakings prior to the notification...