Office welcomes Regional Court´s judgment on pharmaceutical distibutors case
Companies Alliance UniChem CZ (CZK 23.859 million), GEHE Pharma Praha (CZK 16.831 million), PHARMOS (CZK 18.638 million), and PHOENIX Lékárenský velkoobchod (CZK 53.736 million) violated the Competition Act when during the period from January 30, 2006 until February 14, 2006, they coordinated their joint intent to suspend, effective as of February 15, 2006, the supply of the full range of pharmaceuticals to three important teaching hospitals – Thomayerova, Na Bulovce (both in Prague), and Nemocnice u Sv. Anny (in Brno). They implemented their joint intent as of the said day in a coordinated fashion when they began to supply the hospitals concerned only with “vital” pharmaceuticals, with significantly shortened payment maturity periods. The suspension of the supply of pharmaceuticals to the three hospitals, and the shortened payment maturity periods as of February 15, 2006, was announced by the distributors at a joint press conference held on February 14, 2006.
They used these anticompetitive steps to accomplish a common goal, i.e., payment of debts by the hospitals concerned. While it is not a problem when distributors seek payment of their receivables, they must not coordinate their activities in the supply of pharmaceuticals, or harmonize their business terms, to that end. During the administrative proceeding, the Competition Office gathered nearly two dozen exhibits evidencing such conduct. This case constituted acting in concert, where undertakings replace the risk of mutual competition by deliberate practical cooperation.
External Relations Department
2025-11-20 / Office for the Protection of Competition has agreed on commitments with Alma Career, job portal system will be more accessible to competitors The Office for the Protection of Competition has closed administrative proceedings concerning the possible abuse of a dominant position by the Alma Career Group in the field of advertising on job portals...
2025-11-20 / Office for the Protection of Competition imposed fine of CZK 9.9 million on K + B Progres for fixing prices for retailers The Office for the Protection of Competition issued a decision to impose a fine of CZK 9,904,000 on K + B Progres, a.s., for infringement of national and EU competition rules. The company was found guilty...
2025-11-13 / Save the Date: ICN Unilateral Conduct Workshop to be held in Prague in April 2026 The Office for the Protection of Competition of the Czech Republic will host next year’s workshop of the International Competition Network (ICN) focusing on unilateral conduct
2025-11-07 / The 2025 St. Martin's Conference Addressed EU-wide Issues and Czech Competition Policy Tools On 5 and 6 November 2025, the 18th annual St. Martin's Conference on news and current trends in the protection of competition and significant market power was held at the premises of the Office for the...
2025-11-07 / AWARDS FOR CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE PROTECTION OF COMPETITION AND FOR THE BEST STUDENT THESIS WERE PRESENTED AT THE ST. MARTIN'S CONFERENCE. During the St. Martin's Conference, Mr. Petr Mlsna, Chairman of the Office for the Protection of Competition, presented Mr. Bogdan Chiritoiu, Chairman of the Romanian Competition Authority, with an award...
2025-10-13 / Merger of Car Dealers in České Budějovice Approved Subject to Conditions Consisting of KIA Car Service Centre Divesture The Office for the Protection of Competition has conditionally cleared the concentration between undertakings CB Auto a.s. and AUTO FUTURE, s.r.o., in the market of the retail sale and servicing of passenger...
2025-09-08 / St. Martin's Conference 2025: introducing topics and opening registration The Office for the Protection of Competition (hereinafter referred to as "the Office") invites experts and others interested in competition law to the 18th annual St. Martin's Conference, which will...
2025-08-05 / The Office Has Again Imposed Fines on Three Meal Voucher Issuers Totalling over CZK 279 million The Office for the Protection of Competition (hereinafter referred to as “the Office”) issued a first-instance decision to reimpose fines on meal voucher issuers, further specifying the exact reasons...